Northern Arizona Gazette

News from around Northern Arizona

How the AARP Made $2.8 Billion By Supporting Obamacare’s Cuts to Medicare

Posted on October 5, 2012 by GCD

(DISCLOSURE: I am an outside adviser to the Romney campaign on health-care issues. The opinions contained herein are mine alone, and do not necessarily correspond to those of the campaign.)

Avik Roy, FORBES—As you know if you’ve been reading this blog, Obamacare cuts $716 billion from Medicare in order to pay for its $1.9 trillion expansion of coverage to low-income Americans. It’s one of the reasons why seniors are more opposed to the new health law than any other age group. So why is it that the group that purports to speak for seniors, the American Association of Retired Persons, so strongly supports a law that most seniors oppose?

According to an explosive new report from Sen. Jim DeMint (R., S.C.), it’s because those very same Medicare cuts will give the AARP a windfall of $1 billion in insurance profits, and preserve another $1.8 billion that AARP already generates from its business interests.

Read more at Forbes.

Camp Civitan Christmas and Easter sale through Sunday

Posted on October 5, 2012 by GCD

WILLIAMS—Camp Civitan—in downtown Williams next to the Grand Canyon Coffee and Cafe—is selling out all of their stock of Christmas decorations. There are some Easter decorations, as well. The move is to clear out their closet which is in need of repair.

The Christmas decorations include ornaments, lights, two trees, stuffed toys and other various items. The Easter items consists of roughly the same materials. Everything must go so they are making good deals on the stock.

The sale is in the backyard of the store, but you can enter from the front.

We believe in the First Amendment to the Constitution and that it protects speech that we do not want to hear, not speech that we want to hear. However, we do not believe that protects personal slurs, slander or libel.

Please understand that we reserve the right to edit or delete comments which contain what we consider personal attacks rather than specific useful information. Especially since commentators are not obligated to leave their full or even real names. We cannot set a specific set of guidelines, so please feel free to leave a comment with the understanding that we reserve the right to edit what we consider personal attacks.

This does not apply to so-called "hate speech" given in generalized terms. If one or two people do not like what you say, that does not make it hate speech.

We will gladly post e-mails or letters to the editors so long as you give your full name and address so that we can verify it is from a real person. We will not post the address at your request.

While some may consider this "cowardly," we consider it responsible journalism. We are trying to bring you information you need in a responsible manner.

Thank you for your understanding.